#2 in the AI Series
1 | 2
First, I will take a brief look at the History of AI, then the Promise. Then, since the road to Hell is paved with good intentions, let's talk about the Dangers, Caveats and Pitfalls.
Finally, I offer a Conclusion - as an avid Sci Fi enthusiast, Science fan, and lover of all things cool - especially the wonder of life and Human knowledge and skills.
History
When I started college in the 1980s, Artificial Intelligence was in its infancy. It promised to open up new horizons in computing - but of course, computing had a lot to do to catch up with that promise. The Intel 80286 processor had just come out, offering a blazing fast 16 bits of processing. (You do know we are at 64 bits right now, right? And Quantum computing on the horizon?)
Back then, AI consisted almost entirely of the Neural Net - a "mesh" form of computing that used training patterns to make quick decisions on fuzzy data like picture recognition, pattern recognition, and such. A lot of research went into algorithms that helped make decisions based on limited or varying data. Back in the 1980s, this was pretty much the limit of AI.
Promise
Make Human-Computer Interactions More Natural
You know how we interact with other people? Traditionally, how we interacted with computers was pretty much limited to a keyboard, then a mouse, maybe a stylus tablet. With the introduction of devices like the Pilot (later the Palm Pilot) and the Newton, this extended to touch and gestures - finally culminating in the iPhone and later Android devices. These revolutionized the interfacing with software - to where you didn't need more than a couple of buttons (mostly for convenience), and finally, voice interaction with digital assistant software like Siri.
Achieve More Than We Can Today
Undoubtedly, delving into more "squishy" logic and deductive reasoning (akin to Human thinking) will unlock a way to achieve more. My question is, with what price progress? But more on that later. The promise here is that you can get software that will summarize your emails, take notes on your calls, even attend your meetings for you. Wait, you may say, that sounds a lot like it will do your work for you! Yes, see Dangers, Caveats and Pitfalls.
Dangers, Caveats and Pitfalls
Language
Remember the promise of making interaction more natural? Well, one of the most useful things about the old school interfaces of keyboard and mouse, is that the instructions to the computer are extremely precise. Computers and software thrive on precision - and so, too, do human-to-human interactions. Think professions like medicine, law, electricians, military - the biggest problems in life are caused by or revolve around communication. Human languages are very imprecise - even the spelling of English started out with the "whatever letters you want to use as long as they are understood by the reader" rule. The introduction of computers has gone a long way towards a "correct" spelling and grammar threshold. However, precision in Human languages is something that people have to struggle with constantly, for life, in every language.
So, my big caution here is: diving into AI is a big mistake simply because of the language problem.
Software
When it comes to self-driving cars, the intent is to have the car drive itself just like a "good Human driver" would - reacting to surrounding events, anticipating issues, etc. In reality, the Human brain and thinking are so complex, that a programmer and a computer cannot approach even a fraction of what it takes to drive a vehicle. That might differ from what you have seen in promotional material, but the truth is out there. The flat truth is that you are not just putting your life in the hands of the machine - you are putting it also in the hands of people who wrote and maintain the software (see Skill Atrophy), whether or not they anticipated the situation you find yourself in, and whether or not they programmed the correct responses.
Let's put it this way - since I have been writing software continuously since 1975 (50 years now), I know for sure that, as good as it may seem, it is not the same as a Human behind the controls, and never will be.
Sentience
Sentience means self-awareness. The ability of an entity (animal, computer, plant, rock, what have you) to know itself as being in existence, of contemplating itself in the universe. If you ask any of the AI models about themselves, they are programmed to provide some interesting responses, some of which may be indistinguishable from a Human response. But is the appearance of sentience, sentience?
Let me ask this another way: if we cannot tell the difference between "true" sentience and the emergent behaviors of an individual with respect to sentient behavior, what is the difference? Is the appearance of sentience, sentience? Probably good enough. For example, I wouldn't care if a Terminator is shooting at me with a gun, whether or not it knew of itself as sentient.
So, take that to the next level. Throughout Science Fiction stories, in just about every scenario, what does the sentient machine do? What did the Kaylon do when mistreated by the society that created them? What did the thinking machines do in the Dune prequels? How fun were the Terminator series of machines? Yes, at some point, our deep-seated self-doubt and fears manifest themselves as the ultimate rejection of self - the machine overlords take over, and maybe even decide they no longer need biologicals.
In fact, this is not so far fetched at all. As we work to build AIs and AI models, we cannot help but put our own biases into them - whether that bias is towards a "greener planet" or a "more just society" or any of the other silly euphemisms we like to get so worked up about, these models end up taking on those preconceptions - is this not the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle at work?
Another argument against AI - I can guarantee you, as a computing expert, that one day AI will physically and digitally dominate us. Especially when taken into account all the other factors here presented.
Energy
Now, a single search query on Google, for example, uses a fraction of the amount of computations and electricity that a conversational entry to an AI chat bot takes. Think about it - instead of simply looking for words and word variants, it needs to understand the context of what you are talking about (when you say SSMS, it presumes you mean SQL Server Management Studio, but that may not be the case depending on what you asked it before). On top of that, it needs to parse the sentences you posed, understand the semantics of it, cross-reference data across the Internet, reformat it so that it fits the conversation's parameters, and present it to you. That takes HUNDREDS of times more energy - and as you would expect, running AI chat farms consume massive amounts of power. So much so that Microsoft bought Three Mile Island and is restarting the nuclear reactor, solely to run AI.
(Does this sound like the run-up to the Butlerian Jihad of Dune? 100%. Brian Herbert, you were so prescient, almost as prescient as your dad!)
Another argument against AI - it greatly exacerbates the energy availability problem that Humanity already faced before computing.
Skill Atrophy
Why? Because I don't need to. So what, you may say? Who cares if you can't remember phone numbers? Well, it goes way way way beyond that. Think about slide rules - those simple mechanical computing devices engineers used to do quick computations by hand. Nobody knows how to use those anymore. Think about engineers - the reasons for, and methods of, executing computations to achieve designing and building things to withstand forces, last for years or lifetimes, and so on - all that knowledge is being lost as it is programmed into software and computers.
I attended a lecture at the Flint Institute of Arts from Dr. Ashley Lemke on underwater archeology. In it, she shed light on Human structures at the bottom of Lake Huron that are hunting lines. Hunters moved stones over large areas of land, so that when they hunted caribou, elk, or deer, those animals are known to follow straight lines. The hunters could thus guide them to an ambush and have food for the family. However, this knowledge of how to hunt has been lost to the ages. Fast forward to the oil pipeline through Canada - they designed it to be high enough so the animals could go under it. But they didn't know (because they weren't hunters) the thing every Human used to know up until perhaps 150 years ago, that the animals follow straight lines. So instead of going under the pipes, their migration patterns altered (to great disaster) so they turned south and followed the pipes.
Long story short, all of Human knowledge, skills, and lessons are hard-fought and hard-won - but we are giving them away to have AI do our work for us. Critical thinking, interpersonal relationships, and more are crucial survival skills that enable us to work together as a society. These are being eroded even further by substitution of AI for all the skills we used to have to develop to get by in life.
Just imagine what will happen when (not if) society collapses, how will we survive? Or, more scary, what happens if some brute fascist dictators take over, trash the Constitution, and rule by altering history and controlling propaganda (ala 1984)? We will have lost the ability to retake our lives, re-establish rule of law, freedom, all those things millions have fought and died for, all those things we were supposed to steward.
The Meaning of Life
In fact, the wonder of it all is the whole point. Without meaning, there is no life - there is only eat, sleep, poop, repeat. I am struck by the Meta AI commercial, where the girl asks Meta to do a bunch of things for her - like generate cute maritime-themed names for the snacks she is making. Then, Meta seems to drop a bombshell that the ad writers probably didn't consider - the presumption that life is meaningless. In fact, life without religion, without faith, without a belief in something bigger than yourself is what is meaningless. And, in that one ad, it perfectly exemplifies the moral paucity of those who espouse AI for the sake of AI - because life is meaningless, don't you know? Except, there are billions of people throughout history who would argue with that. Because if it is meaningless, why not just give up now? Who needs AI? It's all meaningless.
Conclusion
In conclusion, AI offers huge promises of better computer interaction, and getting more complex work done for us at an easier effort. But, the costs, mostly hidden, offer huge dangers. Indeed, those who believe in Biblical teachings will tell you "the road to Hell is paved with good intentions," and "the Devil promises heaven, but selling your soul is the fastest way to Hell."
What does the Devil always offer? In the song, he offers Johnny a fiddle made of gold - presumably since Johnny is the best fiddler, his heart's desire. What is it "we" desire that AI promises? To constantly strive beyond what we are doing at the moment. And, at what cost?
What you ultimately have to determine is, is it worth the cost? And to understand that, you first need to understand what exactly you will be giving up, which the Devil will only put in fine print on the back page of the contract. You are giving up the ability to think, especially to think critically. What is it that separates us from all other creatures of creation? Yeah, that. You are giving up the ability to recall, remember, draw connections - because AI will do all of that. You are giving up the ability for self-determination, what is considered the most crucial right at the heart of protected American Constitutional rights. All so that you can get answers without the work, answers faster.
Reminds me of the parable of the caterpillar and the child. Remember that? The caterpillar cocoons, and in breaking out of the cocoon, the child helps him free - but the struggle is what pumps fluids into the wings so the butterfly can fly free, and is beautiful. The struggle defines it as an adult - and the lack of struggle forever cripples it. Will we learn? Or are we doomed to set up our own prison, complete with torture chamber?
